$165,000 (over 40%) was pocketed by Brown and Curry Law Firm of Kansas City, who represented the women in separate suits.
McClure alleged the same football longsnapper who raped Tackett in his room in 2014 groped McClure in her apartment in 2015. Both assaults reportedly occurred in the Jayhawker Towers dorm. Tackett’s lawsuit sued KU for false advertising in claiming its dorms were safe.
The longsnapper, Jordan Goldenberg Jr. (below), left KU in 2016. In an interesting twist, his KU coach, Gary Hyman, was hired by Indiana State University in February of that year. Goldenberg transferred onto the ISU team, but was removed before the season started.
Tackett and McClure alleged in their lawsuit that as members of KU rowing, they were required by the university to attend football games and encouraged to “party” with football recruits.
Douglas County District Attorney’s office found insufficient evidence in McClure’s complaint to charge Goldenberg. Tackett reported her assault after hearing McClure’s story.
The National Holocaust Museum (recent landing pad for smug press-manipulator and American-sponsored Fidel Castro funeral attendee Ben Rhodes, national security adviser in the waning days of the Obama administration) withdrew a study that reportedly softened the blame on Obama for America’s complacency in the face of Bashar al-Assad‘s Syrian genocide.
The study, originally slated for release on September 11, argued that “a variety of factors, which were more or less fixed, made it very difficult from the beginning for the US government to take effective action to prevent atrocities in Syria, even compared with other [STUPID PHRASE ALERT] challenging policy contexts:
Using computational modeling and game theory methods, as well as interviews with experts and policymakers, the report asserted that greater support for the anti-Assad rebels and US strikes on the Assad regime after the August 2013 Ghouta chemical weapons attack would not have reduced atrocities in the country, and might conceivably have contributed to them.
“The first thing I have to say is: Shame on the Holocaust Museum,” said Leon Wieseltier, the literary critic and fellow at the Brookings Institution, who slammed the Museum for “releasing an allegedly scientific study that justifies bystanderism.”
The Museum’s exercise in counter-factual history, he suggested, was inherently absurd. “If I had the time I would gin up a parody version of this that will give us the computational-modeling algorithmic counterfactual analysis of John J McCloy’s decision not to bomb the Auschwitz ovens in 1944. I’m sure we could concoct the fucking algorithms for that, too.”
America started “surveillance” missions against ISIS in Syria three years ago. It is unclear how many troops are deployed there now (Politico reported 500 in August), but Trump’s attack of the Shayrat air fields in April (in response to Assad’s Khan Shaykhun chemical attack) was apparently our first “direct military action” amidst the genocide. This does not include the thousands of bombs we lay on Syria annually to create more refugees help.
Another Obama-era hack, Constitution-trampling former CIA Director John Brennan (below) became a “Distinguished Fellow for Global Security” at Fordham University’s Law School.
Representatives from Chik-Fil-A offered to collaboratively run unspecified programming with the Rainbow Alliance in conjunction with the rollout of a venue on campus. Due to continued concerns regarding this issue, however, the Rainbow Alliance unanimously voted against the proposal. Several students independently reached out to USG to voice their concerns, according to then-USG president Leighton Magoon, Fordham College at Lincoln Center (FCLC) ’17.
“If they want to bring in Chick-Fil-A, they can bring in Chick-Fil-A,” Renata Francesco, FCLC ’19 and Rainbow Alliance Co-President, said. “But we’re not going to partner with an institution, a corporation that has so strongly supported other institutions that work to destabilize and demolish movements for queer equity.”
The university apparently considered student group feedback before rejecting the proposal of food service giant Aramark to open a Fordham location.
Late Chik-fil-A founder S. Truett Cathy‘s widely-publicized defense of “traditional” marriage (between one man and one woman) in 2012 and the chain’s donations to pro-family groups aside, the Roman Catholic university also noted “the hot entree Cloverleaf station” at Ram Cafe would have to be remodeled if Chik-fil-A were allowed on campus. Additionally:
“Certainly, there were some menu concerns as it related to special diets that Chick-Fil-A did not have a lot to offer for,” [Dining Services Contract Liaison Deming] Yaun said. “They didn’t have a lot to address special diets.”
And Hillary‘s “spiritual adviser,” the Rev. Bill Shillady (Shillady)(below), was caught plagiarizing. Oops.
Not-so-slim-Shady’s collection of sermons, whose forward was written by Hillary (when she wasn’t poring over What Happened, also out in September–post-presidential campaign speaking fees just don’t bank like they used to, apparently), is titled Strong for a Moment Like This: The Daily Devotions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. It features a non-leap year’s haul of daily scripture reflections, as well “notes,” “selected responses,” “portions of [Hillary’s] speeches,” shit like that.
Abingdon Press pulled the book from stores immediately. By September 8, the hardcover was going for just under $500 on Amazon, with an average review of 2.2 stars. At the time of this posting, however, new hardcover copies cost just under $40 and the rating was up to 3 stars.
HuffPost reported everyone’s favorite politically-correct prick, Bill Nye, has leveled a lawsuit at Disney. The entertainment giant produced Nye’s publicly-propped PBS production “Bill Nye the Science Guy” in the 1990s.
A Nye-ordered audit of the Walt Disney Company from last year reportedly found the fake scientist was stiffed $9.3 million since 1993 under the distribution deal.
Former FBI Director James Comey (below) has scored a lucrative part-time lecture position at Howard University in Washington, D.C.
Comey will refund his $100,000 haul from the “Gwendolyn S. and Colbert I. King Endowed Chair in Public Policy” position to offer scholarships to students from foster homes entering the historically black university.
The first appearance for the much-maligned 2016 Trump victory architect will be the September convocation for students.
The ensuing five lecture topics “will be decided after the ex-FBI chief converses with student leaders and other campus stakeholders.”
Meanwhile, in the longstanding tradition of Washington beneficiaries, Time reports:
Comey’s tenure at Howard University will coincide with the release of his widely anticipated book, which is expected to be published in the Spring of 2018.
According to Washington Examiner, Comey commanded the trust and approval of colleagues, as documented on score sheets from three years’ worth of FBI “internal memos” released to news organizations for fulfillment of FOIA requests (which the FBI, unlike the State Department, apparently honors).
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 3.81 or higher indicating success, Comey’s subordinates reportedly gave him at least a 3.81 on “nearly every item.” Grade inflation!
Comey received a score of 4.47 from employees when asked to grade the former director on the “trust and confidence” they have in him as a leader. The former FBI director received a 4.48 from subordinates on whether they would work for Comey again, and a 4.22 when asked if he is humble.
Employees gave Comey a score of 4.38 for being someone more interested in leading than being liked.
The scores reportedly dipped slightly this year compared to 2016.
[T]he plan includes $2.5 billion in spending cuts, including 5 percent across-the-board reductions to most state agencies and a 10 percent cut to higher education.
The personal income tax rate goes from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent, which is expected to generate roughly $4.3 billion. A rise in the corporate income tax rate from 5.25 percent to 7 percent would bring in another $460 million.
State priorities resumed:
[T]he Illinois Department of Transportation announced that road contractors can resume working on projects that were suspended days earlier. And the Illinois Lottery announced Mega Millions ticket sales had resumed and the agency has requested that it be allowed to resume sales of Powerball tickets.
Also buried in the budget plan is a measure pushed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel to shore up two [Chicago] worker pension funds, which the governor had vetoed when lawmakers passed it as a stand alone bill earlier this year.
Interestingly, Illinois will spend $36,100,000,000in the upcoming year, down from $39,000,000,000 currently.
Of note, Rauner quietly vetoed some bills on August 18 that would reportedly “provide transparency” of state-run agencies, as well as let Lake County voters decide if the county board chairman should be elected at-large, establish a state-run workers’ compensation insurance company, and allow those who care for the disabled to work overtime.
Disallowing the final point, Rauner, whose health care experience includes funding the Chicago Red Cross headquarters, noted, “safeguards individual providers from being unnecessarily overworked and ensures that residents requiring long hours of care will have more than one person who understands their needs and who is capable of caring for them.”
Comptroller Susana Mendoza(D), who passed the bill, was allegedly attempting to “micromanage executive agencies,” per Rauner.
Mendoza assumed office in December following a special election victory.
The micromanaging would have required agencies to report monthly on their non-submitted bills and estimate the resulting interest payments with which they would drag down the state.
Rauner approved a bill that reportedly requires free feminine hygiene products in public school bathrooms.
Chicago Tribune reports the city has a net loss of residents in both 2015 and 2016–nearly 20,000 last year alone–the only top-ten U.S. metropolitan statistical area to actually decline in population over that period.
The murder rate probably isn’t helping. Chicago registered the year’s 400th homicide on July 31, for a rate of about two murders per day.
For example, during 12 hours over August 19 and 20, thirty-three Chicago residents were shot, according to Chicago Tribune. Six died.
Over the Independence Day weekend, over 100 were shot, and 15 died.
University of Floridarecently started accepting applications for its “Living Learning Communities” (LLCs), not to be confused with limited liability corporations (LLCs). (The $1.46 billion-endowed Swamp is exempt from government taxes, so it can accept unlimited amounts of money from anyone anxious to lessen their own tax burden with a cool write-off.)
Apparently, these are special dorm situations at UF for students to rack up debt with an exclusive group of roommates who think more like them. College is for limiting your world view, after all.
In a Buzzfeed propaganda piece, UF lauded the LLCs’ Exclusive Networking Opportunities (“an ‘in’ to special seminars and programs hosted throughout the year”), Unreal Amenities (“3D printing”), and support of Wellness and Self-Care. Because Americans are now children until their 26th birthday, that final brochure bullet includes: “Walk and Talks” with UF faculty and staff, yoga classes, mindfulness workshops, and healthy cooking demos, as well as community amenities like dedicated lounges and study spaces, and coloring books and pencils in each LLC, UF LLCs recognize that taking care of YOU is wildly important!
Daniel Weldon, a Gator linebacker and Young America’s Foundation campus chapter founder, took exception.
We were unable to obtain the annual rent figures from the university site for the various LLCs and how they compare to the price of dorms for the commoners.
The university, like so many former strongholds of free speech across our self-castrated country of coddled adult-children, additionally regulated student group events by requiring an assessment of “emotional risk” for all activities.
Young America’s Foundation again gave us the dirty details. We ripped the following images from their site, reportedly reproduced from the UF office of Student Activities and Involvement:
Would anyone wager that a speaker like Charles Murray or Ann Coulter will necessitate SAI “staff presence,” and confiscatory fees from minority-opinion groups in the Gainesville gaggle?
Washington Post first picked up on a graduating high school senior in North Carolina who was denied his diploma for refusing to read the school’s prepared commencement address instead of his own composition.
Marvin Wright, 18, was senior class president and slated to deliver the graduation address for Southwest Edgecombe High last June.
After reportedly working for weeks on his speech, Wright was told the morning of graduation he would read the following instead:
I would like to thank all of our friends and family for being here tonight. I would also like to address my fellow graduates one last time before we leave this gym. Although we may all never be in the same room at the same time again, we will always share the memories that we created within these walls. And no matter what we all do after graduation, never forget that this is one place that we all have in common, this place is home. Congratulations graduates, we did it!
“I felt robbed of a chance to say my own words.” –Marvin Wright
[I]nstead of delivering [the school speech], [Wright] took out his cellphone and read a copy of his original speech, with his friends in the audience nodding to him in encouragement.
Sitting behind Marvin, the principal, Craig Harris, immediately turned to another staff member, whispering with a look of disapproval, video footage shows.
After the applause and final procession, all of the students lined up to receive their official diplomas. But one folder in the stack was missing: Marvin’s. His senior adviser informed him the principal had removed the diploma because Marvin had read the wrong speech.
“All my friends were outside with their big yellow folders taking pictures and I was still inside, trying to get my diploma,” Marvin said. “I was really hurt and embarrassed, basically humiliated.”
The teenager and his mother, Jokita Wright, accused the school of not only censoring a student’s words but then retaliating against him by withholding his diploma. The mother complained to the principal, who explained to her that her son had missed a deadline to submit the speech to the school. Marvin says he never knew about it.
Wright apparently had left his speech on his principal’s desk that morning, and was obliged to seek out teachers for advice on writing the speech, as no guidance was provided.
Marvin did not receive his diploma for another two days, when the principal dropped it off at his home at the request of the superintendent. The principal handed him the diploma, saying only, “If your mom has any questions just give me a call.” Then he left.
Superintendent John Farrelly noted:
“There is an expectation that is communicated to all graduation speakers that the prepared and practiced speech is the speech to be delivered during the ceremony. That was made extremely clear to the speakers. The student did not follow those expectations.”
This is interesting, because according to our sources, the “prepared and practiced” speech was in fact the one Mr. Wright read from his phone.
The school might have picked a more controversial or underachieving student to publicly castigate. Mr. Wright begins his service in the U.S. Navy in October. Miami Herald notes he eventually plans to be a pediatric surgeon.
The school seems fine with flaunting the graduates they collectively silenced, featuring them parading the halls of local elementary schools, in costume, on the Southwest Edgecombe website.
At least SEHS didn’t follow the Chicago way, in which thug mayor Rahm Emanuel requires documentation of a young adult’s post-graduation plans before surrendering a high school diploma.
Harvard University announced its draconian late fees ($0.50/day!!) for library books would be eliminated beginning April 1, 2017.
Fox News caught the story in May from The Harvard Crimson.
“We have witnessed first-hand the stress that overdue fines can cause for students,” Harvard administrator Steven Beardsley explained, even going so far as to declare that “Eliminating standard overdue fines…should help students focus on their scholarship, rather than worrying about renewing library books every 28 days in order to avoid fines.”
Additionally, Harvard performed some specialized graduation ceremonies this year. The inclusiveness of their progressive programs reportedly offers young adults the opportunity to graduate grouped by race.
International Business Times chose to decorate this story with a picture of Kylie Jenner handing a police officer a can of Pepsi.
For example, the Black Commencement eventboasted hundreds of students and their guests:
The organisers [sic] say that the event is a celebration of “fellowship” rather than “segregation” and highlights the unique achievements of black students at an institution that has grappled with its historic ties to slavery.
Michael Huggins, a student who will receive a master’s degree in public policy from the Harvard Kennedy School in Massachusetts at the end of this month, told The Root that the ceremony is “an opportunity to celebrate Harvard’s black excellence and black brilliance.”
He stressed that the event is not about segregation but about “building a community.”
“This is a chance to reaffirm for each other that we enter the work world with a network of supporters standing with us. We are all partners,” he said.
All graduates will receive a shawl made of kente cloth, a representation of their African heritage, which they will wear over their graduation robes.
The third annual ceremony specifically for students of Latin American descent is slated for the same day.
Harvard’s commencement speaker this year was everyone’s favorite billionaire hypocrite, Mark Zuckerberg, creator of the leading social media platform Facebook. It was not apparent from the IBTarticle whether Zucks was scheduled to address the black-students-only graduation, the Latino-students-only graduation, or the other people ceremony.
In any case, he recently filmed himself conferring with fellow disdainful billionaire progressive and Harvard dropout Bill Gates to build hype for the commencement appearance:
In a video posted on his Facebook page, Zuckerberg jokes with Microsoft co-founder and fellow famous Harvard dropout Bill Gates discussing his upcoming speech at the Ivy-League institution and asking him for “advice”.
“They know we didn’t actually graduate, right?” Zuckerberg tells Gates in the video.
Social media was not the best outlet for several incoming Harvard freshman, who will no longer have the privilege of joiningMalia Obama as she wraps her ambitious “gap year.”
Disclosure: The authors’ viewership of Bill Nye Saves the World consists only of the clips contained in this article.
Climate change awareness propagandistBill Nye the Science Guy has really [SETTLED SCIENCE ALERT] evolved from the days of his 1990s eponymous, taxpayer-propped series (used to fulfill the Children’s Television Act requirements of TV stations that air children’s programming, levied by the Federal Communications Commission).
His new gig on Netflix, Bill Nye Saves the World, is rated “TV-14.” It is not difficult to see why.
Mother Jones brought us a couple excerpts:
According to the episode list on Wikipedia, Bill starts by exploring (relatively) innocuous and arguably essential public awareness topics such as climate change and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The series then addresses the “sexual spectrum” and “Earth’s people problem.”
Conservative National Review reports the latter episode involves Nye and his guests contemplat[ing] a thorny “scientific” question: How can the state stop people from having “extra kids”?
New York Post had more on that controversial exchange:
[Nye]: “Should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?”
Travis Rieder, a bioethicist at Johns HopkinsUniversity, said he believed it was a good idea.
“I do think that we should at least consider it,” he told Nye.
“Well, ‘at least consider it’ is like ‘Do it,’” Nye said.
Rieder replied, “One of the things that we could do that’s kind of least policy-ish is we could encourage our culture and our norms to change, right?”
Presumably this is all in pursuit of conserving resources:
Before Nye posed the controversial question, Rieder had claimed that children in developed countries such as the United States typically used 160 times more resources than those elsewhere.
Gender identity is not necessarily relevant to the sexual spectrum episode from the clip we viewed, but can also be a divisive issue politically. Divisive, like telophase of the chromosomes! Nye went back in time to do some editing of his past belief in chromosomes determining a person’s gender.
[YouTube bowed to political pressure and struck the damning video from its streaming servers. The Guardian has what appears to be the entire original episode that includes the chromosome conundrum at 9:07:
A segment saying that chromosomes determine one’s gender on an episode of the educational children’s show “Bill Nye the Science guy,” is cut out on the Netflix version.
Netflix did not edit Bill Nye The Science Guy. The series was delivered that way by Buena Vista TV, according to a Netflix spokesperson.
[I]n the version of the episode uploaded to Netflix, the segment [asserting genetics determine gender] has been cut entirely. While noncontroversial at the time, the 1996 segment appears to contradict Netflix’s new series “Bill Nye Saves the World.”
The new show endorses a socially liberal understanding of gender, under which gender is defined by self-identification rather than genetics and there are more than just the two traditional genders.
Update May 5, 2017 9:28 a.m.: This post has been updated to reflect comment from Netflix, which says it did not have a role in cutting the segment from the episode.
Left-wing Vox notes the intended target audience is “skeptics”: Bill Nye Saves the World’s agenda is explicitly skeptical — that is, it’s geared toward debunking false assumptions about science, bad pseudoscience, medical quackery, and harmful non-scientific beliefs.
A longstanding criticism of the skeptics community is that its members often profess mocking or condescending attitudes toward anyone who believes in things skeptics are opposed to — primarily religion, the paranormal, and pseudoscience.
This attitude is prevalent on Nye’s show, which frequently takes a scathing and dismissive tone toward non-scientific belief systems.
At one point during a demonstration of Earth’s origins, Nye banishes from his diorama of early life on the planet a small model of Noah’s ark, declaring, “there’s no freaking Noah’s ark, I’m sorry,” as he tosses it aside.
Vox further exposes Nye’s hypocrisy on GMOs: the D.C. dandy hosts a Monsanto cheerleader in his series:
Nye recently reversed his entire stance on GMOs following a visit to Monsanto, and it quickly becomes evident that [Monsanto chief technical officer Robert] Fraley is there not just to defend GMOs, but Monsanto itself.
[Keep those Federal farm subsidies coming, they’re definitely lifelines for struggling small farmers and not benefiting Big Agriculture and gene-splicing plant technology giants like Monsanto. Hundreds of millions of dollars in farm subsidies are claimed annually by people that have never set foot on a farm according to Environmental Working Group. Oops. Bill the taxpayers.]
Even more to their credit, Vox reports:
[Nye] does briefly bring up that Monsanto produced Agent Orange, but fails to explain what it was: a chemical defoliant used strategically during the Vietnam War that decimated the environment, exposed millions of US soldiers to cancer-causing toxins, and caused hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese children to be born with birth defects. Instead, he lobs a softball question at Fraley in which they both treat Monsanto’s production of Agent Orange as an unfortunate accident from a bygone historical moment — when in fact, Agent Orange continues to impact both the country and Vietnam veterans to this day. Nye also sort-of brings up Roundup’s role in decimating the Monarch butterfly population, yet neglects to mention that Monsanto is the company that makes Roundup.
Duquesne University in Pittsburgh reported on a March 26 Student Government Association attack on the Southern fried chicken vendor, Chik-fil-A.
The fast food franchise operates under Christian Southern Baptist values, famously closing on Sundays to allow employees to attend church. They also found themselves in hot peanut oil in 2012 when founder S. Truett Cathy (age: 91) and his son Dan (then COO, now CEO after S. Truett’s death) made statements to the media expressing their belief in marriage as a union of opposite sexes. Chik-fil-A has also reportedly given millions of dollars to pro-heterosexual marriage only organizations.
Specifically, according to Wikipedia, Dan Cathy said those who “have the audacity to define what marriage is about” were “inviting God’s judgment on our nation.”
Incidentally, 2012 was the year President Obama announced his support for gay marriage. Hillary Clinton announced her support the following year. Both campaigned for president in 2008 defending marriage as a union between man and woman only.
Senator at Large Niko Martini proposed that the SGA pass a resolution asking the university to reconsider the inclusion of Chick-fil-A as a dining option for students.
“Chick-fil-A has a questionable history on civil rights and human rights,” he said in a statement to The Duke. “I think it’s imperative the university chooses to do business with organizations that coincide with the [university’s] mission and expectations they give students regarding diversity and inclusion.”
Lambda [Gay Straight Alliance] President Rachel Coury personally said she worries the safety provided by Gay-Straight Alliance might be in jeopardy.
“I’ve tried very hard within the last semester and a half to promote this safe environment for the LGBTQ+ community,” Coury said. “So I fear that with the Chick-fil-A being in Options that maybe people will feel that safe place is at risk.”
Duquesne announced March 20 the addition of the Chick-fil-A Express to the Options Food Court beginning in the upcoming fall semester. The decision to add a Chick-fil-A was a response to student feedback, according to Duquesne spokeswoman Bridget Fare.
The problem seems to stem from a $1,017,610 donation Chik-fil-A made to Fellowship of Christian Athletes in 2014.
The FCA has a “Sexual Purity Statement” for its volunteers and staff. It includes stipulations such as, “The Bible is clear in teaching on sexual sin including sex outside of marriage and homosexual acts. Neither heterosexual sex outside of marriage nor any homosexual act constitute an alternative lifestyle acceptable to God.”
“It would be a really big deal for Lambda and the whole LGBTQ community on campus if someone could make a statement to eliminate the fear of being marginalized by having this business on campus,” Coury said.
[all our emphasis]
Duquesne is not the first left-leaning university to decry the dangerous chicken. Student government at The Johns Hopkins University in 2015 preemptively banned Chik-fil-A from operating on campus. The Southern fried chicken giant had reportedly not even considered vending to the $3.4 billion-endowed charitable organization at the time of the ban.
It was shaping up to be quite a day for “higher education.” The Wellesley News, student newspaper of the private all-female Massachusetts school Wellesley College, ran a typo- and error-rife editorial defending the suppression of speech they do not endorse.
It read in part:
“Wellesley is certainly not a place for racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, transphobia or any other type of discriminatory speech. Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech [sic?]. The founding fathers put free speech in the Constitution as a way to protect the disenfranchised and to protect individual citizens from the power of the government. The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging.
“Students who come to Wellesley hail from a variety of diverse backgrounds. With this diversity comes previously-held biases that are in part the products of home environments. Wellesley forces us to both recognize and grow from these beliefs, as is the mark of a good college education. However, as students, it is important to recognize that this process does not occur without bumps along the way. It is inevitable that there will be moments in this growth process where mistakes will happen and controversial statements will be said [sic].
“We have all said problematic claims [sic], the origins of which were ingrained in us by our discriminatory and biased society. Luckily, most of us have been taught by our peers and mentors at Wellesley in a productive way. It is vital that we encourage people to correct and learn from their mistakes rather than berate them for a lack of education they could not control.
“This being said, if people are given the resources to learn and either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs, then hostility may be warranted.
It is important to note that our preference for education over beration [sic] regards students who may have not been given the chance to learn. Rather, we are not referring to those who have already had the incentive to learn and should have taken the opportunities to do so [sic]. Paid professional lecturers and politicians are among those who should know better.
There is no denying that problematic opinions need to be addressed in order to stop Wellesley from becoming a place where hate speech and casual discrimination is okay.
[all our emphasis]
Our research of the $48,802/year-tuition outfit found some guidelines as to exactly what qualifies a woman’s application to Wellesley. (Men are ineligible to apply.)
From the Reaffirmation of Mission and Announcing Gender Policy and FAQ:
What does it mean to “live as a woman and consistently identify as a woman”?
Wellesley invites applications from all those who live as women and consistently identify as women and who are prepared for a rigorous academic environment that challenges them to achieve at their highest potential.
“Consistently” simply denotes a student’s commitment to her gender identity. If an applicant’s gender identity is not clearly reflected in her application materials, the College will request additional information that may include a letter from a parent, healthcare provider, teacher, or clergy, to give a few examples.
Are trans men eligible for admission?
No. Wellesley is deeply committed to our mission to educate women and the College is proud of its history of graduating women who demonstrate the value of women’s leadership. Wellesley does not accept applications from men. Those assigned female at birth who identify as men are not eligible for admission.
Are trans women eligible for admission?
Yes. Wellesley accepts applications from women. Those assigned male at birth who identify as women are eligible for admission.
Are individuals assigned female at birth who identify as non-binary eligible for admission?
Yes. That said, Wellesley is a college dedicated to the education of women. The College provides students with a uniquely empowering learning environment—one designed specifically to prepare women to thrive in a complex world. This singular focus on women is a critical part of the Wellesley experience. Wellesley accepts applications from those who were assigned female at birth and who feel they belong in our community of women.
What support will Wellesley provide if a student no longer identifies as a woman after matriculation?
We support all of our students. Once accepted to Wellesley, every student receives the full support and mentorship of College faculty, staff, and administrators through graduation. If, after being accepted, a student no longer identifies as a woman, the College will continue to support that student. If a student decides to transfer because the student would prefer another educational and social environment, Wellesley will support and facilitate that choice. If the student wishes to continue on and graduate from Wellesley, we will support that choice as well.